美国 9 大过敏原(FALCPA + FASTER Act 2023)
乳、蛋、鱼、甲壳类、木本坚果、花生、小麦、大豆和芝麻--FASTER Act 自 2023 年 1 月起将芝麻纳入。两种申报方式都支持:在配料表内强调,或使用“Contains:”声明。
欧盟 14 种、日本 28 种、韩国 22 种等
在美国 9 种之外,我们还跟踪欧盟 14 种(增加芹菜、芥末、羽扇豆、软体动物、亚硫酸盐)、日本 28 种(增加鲭鱼、鲑鱼、苹果等)、韩国 22 种、澳大利亚/新西兰 10 种。面板会随所选格式的监管机构自动调整。
交叉接触“May contain”声明
预防性过敏原标示是自愿的,但必须真实。为工厂交叉接触风险添加“may contain”声明行,它会作为独立段落紧邻配料声明呈现,符合 FDA 指南。
从配料自动检测
从 FoodData Central 选择“wheat flour”--小麦过敏原自动勾选。添加“soy lecithin”--大豆自动勾选。边缘情况(精炼油、水解物)始终可手动覆盖。
Cross-contact and advisory statements
Precautionary allergen labelling ("May contain tree nuts", "Made in a facility that also processes peanuts") is voluntary in the US but must be truthful and not a substitute for good manufacturing practice. NFL gives advisory statements their own field, rendered as a separate line adjacent to the ingredient statement and "Contains:" declaration, matching FDA guidance on placement.
Keeping advisories structurally separate from the mandatory declaration matters: reviewers and retailers increasingly check that the two are not blurred together, and a clean separation makes your label easier to audit. Common questions about when an advisory is appropriate, and when it reads as ass-covering that dilutes real warnings, are covered in the labels FAQ.
Because allergens are the #1 recall trigger
Undeclared allergens are consistently the leading cause of US food recalls, usually not because a company did not know its formula, but because a label and a formula fell out of sync somewhere between reformulation and print. NFL's design attacks exactly that failure mode: one recipe record drives the ingredient statement, the allergen declaration, and the nutrition panel together, so they cannot diverge.
And if the worst happens, the inventory module closes the loop: lot codes on every production run and a one-click recall report PDF that shows exactly which lots and shipments are affected. Try the full chain free in the generator.